Controversial Land Acquisition Bill Referred to Group of Ministers


The controversial Land Acquisition Bill was recently referred to a GoM (Group of Ministers) after some ministers raised reservations on certain provisions of the proposed legislation and said their suggestions were not heard adequately.

According to a central government source, 'Lot of ministries have given their suggestions. They were not adequately heard & hence the matter has been referred to GoM"

Examine Proposal..!
A GoM will be set up shortly to examine the proposal.
The amended Bill has been rechristened as 'The Right to Fair Compensation, Resettlement, 

Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition'.
The Bill was listed for consideration last week. But it was deferred as some ministers sought more time to go through it.

The central government had said in Parliament that provisions have been made in the revised Land Acquisition Bill incorporating recommendations of the Parliamentary Standing Committee to protect the rights of farmers on land & to check the number of families displaced by land acquisition.

More Investor Friendly..!
Seeking to dispel the impression that the Bill will only be Pro - Farmer, Rural Development Ministry had said current economic circumstances dictate the need for making it 'More Investor - Friendly'.
According to the central government, the Bill "endeavours to protect multi-cropped irrigated lands from land acquisition, so as not to adversely affect food safety of India".

Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill..!
The Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011 was introduced in Parliament in September last year (2011) and was referred to a Parliamentary Standing Committee, which submitted its recommendation in May, 2012.
PTI
Share:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

Recent Posts

Featured Post

New Trends in Gold Buying by SIP Tiger

*New Trends in Gold Buying* -More people who traditionally don't usually buy gold are now investing in it. -This could be because they h...